Argumentum, Vol. 21 (2025), pp. 20–25.

Marcel den Dikken & Hideki Kishimoto (eds.): Formal Perspectives on Secondary Predication

Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2024, 417 pp.

Imola-Ágnes Farkas

    Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Letters, Department of English Language and Literature

    imola.farkas@ubbcluj.ro

DOI: 10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2025/3

References

Acedo-Matellán, V. (2016): The Morphosyntax of Transitions. A Case Study in Latin and Other Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001

Boas, H. C. (2003): A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967): Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part I. Journal of Linguistics 3, 37–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949

Hoekstra, T. (1988): Small Clause Results. Lingua 74.2-3, 101–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3

Neeleman, A. (1994): Complex Predicates. Doctoral Dissertation. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Roberts, I. (1988): Predicative APs. Linguistic Inquiry 19.4, 703–710.

Verspoor, C. M. (1997): Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics. Doctoral disser­ta­tion. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.

Wechsler, S. (2005): Resultatives Under the ‘Event-Argument Homomorphism’ Model of Telicity. In: Erteschik-Shir, N. & Rapoport, T. (eds.): The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.001.0001

Yamada, Y. (1987): Two Types of Resultative Constructions. English Linguistics 4, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.4.73