|
Bárczi, G. & Országh, L. (1962): A
magyar nyelv értelmező szótára.
Budapest: Akadémiai kiadó.
Cameron, L. (2003): Metaphor in
Educational Discourse. London:
Continuum.
Crisp, P. (2002):
Metaphorical propositions: a relationale.
Language and Literature 11.1,
7–16.
Deignan, A.
(2005): Metaphor and Corpus
Linguistics. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6
Fauconnier, G.
(1994): Mental Spaces. Aspects of
Meaning Construction in Natural
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582
Fauconnier, G.
(1997): Mappings in Thought and
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220
Fauconnier, G. &
Tuner, M. (1998): Conceptual integration
networks. Cognitive Science 22.2,
133–187.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
Fillmore, Ch. (1982):
Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in
the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from
SICOL-1981. Seoul: Hanshin Pub.
Co.,
111–137.
Grady, J. E. (1997):
Foundations of Meaning. Primary
Metaphors and Primary Scenes.
PhD-dissertation. University of
California, Berkeley.
Johnson, M. (1987):
The Body in the Mind. Chichago:
The University of Chichago Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1983): Mental Models. Towards a
Cognitive Science of Language,
Inference, and Consciousness.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Juhász, J., Szőke, I., O. Nagy, G. &
Kovalszky, M. (1972): Magyar
értelmező kéziszótár. Budapest:
Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kiss, G. (1999): Magyar szókincstár.
Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
Kou, D. & Farkas, O.
(2014): Source domains in
conceptualizations of the state in
Chinese and Hungarian political
discourse. Cognitive Linguistic
Studies 1.1, 101–130.
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.1.1.05kou
Kövecses, Z. (2005):
A metafora. Gyakorlati bevezetés a
kognitív metaforaelméletbe.
Budapest: Typotex.
Kövecses, Z. (2006):
A fogalmi metaforák elmélete és az
elmélet kritikája. Világosság
8–9–10: 87–97.
Kövecses, Z. (2015):
Surprise as a conceptual category.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
13.2, 270–290.
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.01kov
Kövecses, Z. (2020):
Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory.
Cambridge: University Press.
https://doi/org/10.1017/9781108859127
Kövecses, Z. (2021a):
A multilevel and contextualist view of
conceptual metaphor theory. Journal
of Language and Communication 8.2,
133–143.
Kövecses, Z. (2021b):
Testesültség (embodiment) a nyelvben és
gondolkodásban – kognitív nyelvészeti
megközelítés. Replika 121–122,
49–61.
https://doi.org/10.32564/121-122.4
Kövecses, Z., Benczes,
R., Rommel, A. & Szelid, V. (2024):
Universality versus variation in the
conceptualization of
anger: A question of methodology.
Russian Journal of Linguistics
28.1, 55–79.
https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34834
Lakoff, G. & Johnson,
M. (1980): Metaphors We Live By.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
Lakoff, G. (1987):
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What
Categories Reveal About the Mind.
Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lakoff, G. (1996):
Moral Politics. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W.
(1987): Foundations of Cognitive
Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical
prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008): Cognitive
Grammar.
A Basic Introduction.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Musolff, A. (2004):
Metaphor and Political Discourse.
Analogical Reasoning in Debates about
Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.008
Pragglejaz Group
(2007): MIP: a method for identifying
metaphorically used words in discourse.
Metaphor and Symbol 22.1, 1–39.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
Rosch, E. (1978):
Principles of categorization. In: Rosch,
E, & Lloyd, B. B. (Hrsg.): Cognition
and Categorization. Hillsdale, N.
J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 27–48.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032633275-4
Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2015): Language and
emotion: The cognitive linguistic
perspective. In: Lüdtke, U. (Hrsg.):
Emotion in Language. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins, 157–173.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.10.08sch
Semino, E. (2008): Metaphor in
Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Spieß, C. & Köpcke,
K. M. (2015): Metapher und Metonymie.
Theoretische, methodische und empirische
Zugänge.
Berlin: De
Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110369120
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006): Words and their metaphors. In:
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. T. (Hrsg.):
Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor
and Metonymy.
Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter, 64–105.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895
Tendahl, M. (2015):
Relevanztheorie und kognitive Linguistik
vereint in einer hybriden
Metapherntheorie. In: Spieß, C. &
Köpcke, K. M. (Hrsg.): Metapher und
Metonymie. Theoretische, methodische und
empirische Zugänge. Berlin: De
Gruyter, 25–50.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110369120.25
Tjarks, A. (2011): Familienbilder
gleich Weltbilder. Wie familiäre
Metaphern unser politisches Denken und
Handeln bestimmen. Wiesbaden: VS
Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93230-9
Tolcsvai Nagy, G.
(2021): Kognitív szemantika.
Budapest: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.
|
